Russell’s Transcendental Argument Revisited
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper seeks to delineate some of the significant modes of philosophical resistance to, and subversion of, British Idealism already operational in Russell’s earliest work. One key tactic employed in An Essay On the Foundations of Geometry (1897) is to reorient the findings of the ‘modern logic’ of Bradley and Bosanquet by employing some ‘transcendental’ or neo-Kantian strategies. Russell thereby arrives at a number of conclusions with a metaphysical or epistemological import at wide variance with the approach of the British Idealists. Yet, despite this divergence, Russell does retain a basic commitment to at least one of their fundamental logical dogmas: the unity of analysis and synthesis. Should this reading prove fruitful, philosophical analysis in Britain, from its earliest strivings and first manifestations, can be seen as deriving significant sustenance from both Idealist and neo-Kantian
منابع مشابه
Russell’s Paradox of the Totality of Propositions
Russell’s ‘‘new contradiction’’ about ‘‘the totality of propositions’’ has been connected with a number of modal paradoxes. M. Oksanen has recently shown how these modal paradoxes are resolved in the set theory NFU. Russell’s paradox of the totality of propositions was left unexplained, however. We reconstruct Russell’s argument and explain how it is resolved in two intensional logics that are ...
متن کاملDispositions and the principle of least action revisited
The only cardinality restriction is that the size of the collection of definable concepts is no greater than the size of the language (at most countably many in the case of a countable language). This restriction follows not from the diagonalization argument but from what it is to be a definable concept. Definable Basic Law V, which forces ^ to be injective only on the definable concepts, vivid...
متن کاملKant's Logic in the Critique of Practical Reason - a Logical Formalization of Kant's Practical Transcendental Argument Msc in Logic
Logic plays a fundamental role in Kant’s transcendental philosophy. The general presupposition is that Kant’s logic can be subsumed under the Aristotelian tradition. However, with respect to this presupposition some problems arise in Kant’s philosophy. This thesis takes a new approach to Kant’s logic: Instead of imposing a logical framework on Kant’s thought this thesis aims at deriving the log...
متن کاملINCOMPLETE SYMBOLS IN PRINCIPIA MATHEMATICAz AND RUSSELL’S “DEFINITE PROOF”
Early in Principia Mathematicaz Russell presents an argument that “z‘the author of Waverleyz’ means nothing”, an argument that he calls a “deWnite proofz”. He generalizes it to claim that deWnite descriptions are incomplete symbols having meaning only in sentential context. This Principiaz “proofz” went largely unnoticed until Russell reaUrmed a near-identical “proofz” in his philosophical auto...
متن کاملA Relic of a Bygone Age? Causation, Time Symmetry and the Directionality Argument∗
Bertrand Russell famously argued that causation is not part of the fundamental physical description of the world, describing the notion of cause as “a relic of a bygone age” (Russell, 1913, p. 1). This paper assesses one of Russell’s arguments for this conclusion: the ‘Directionality Argument’, which holds that the time symmetry of fundamental physics is inconsistent with the time asymmetry of ...
متن کامل